linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] virtio: Reduce BUG if total

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 10 Aug 2017 18:47:32 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@...hat.com>, jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:     martin.petersen@...cle.com, mst@...hat.com, jasowang@...hat.com,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, hch@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] virtio: Reduce BUG if total_sg > virtqueue size to
 WARN.

On 10/08/2017 18:40, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> If using indirect descriptors, you can make the total_sg as large as
> you want.  If not, BUG is too serious because the function later
> returns -ENOSPC.
> 
> Thanks Paolo Bonzini, Christoph Hellwig.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@...hat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> index 5e1b548828e6..27cbc1eab868 100644
> --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_ring.c
> @@ -296,7 +296,6 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add(struct virtqueue *_vq,
>  	}
>  #endif
>  
> -	BUG_ON(total_sg > vq->vring.num);
>  	BUG_ON(total_sg == 0);
>  
>  	head = vq->free_head;
> @@ -305,8 +304,10 @@ static inline int virtqueue_add(struct virtqueue *_vq,
>  	 * buffers, then go indirect. FIXME: tune this threshold */
>  	if (vq->indirect && total_sg > 1 && vq->vq.num_free)
>  		desc = alloc_indirect(_vq, total_sg, gfp);
> -	else
> +	else {
>  		desc = NULL;
> +		WARN_ON_ONCE(total_sg > vq->vring.num && !vq->indirect);

So we get here only if vq->vq.num_free is zero.  In that case,
vq->indirect makes no difference for the appropriateness of the warning
(that is, it should never be issued for indirect descriptors).

> +	}
>  
>  	if (desc) {
>  		/* Use a single buffer which doesn't continue */
> 


Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>

Paolo