lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 12 Aug 2017 00:56:16 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        bhumirks@...il.com, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        MPT-FusionLinux.pdl@...adcom.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] constify pci_error_handlers structures

On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 09:52:28AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> OK, sure.  So to be precise, you want the fields error_detected,
> mmio_enabled, etc to be added as new fields to the pci_driver structure?

Yes.

> They both have a resume field, though.  What should the pci_error_handlers
> resume function be renamed to?  Would resume_after_error be too much?

error_resume maybe?

FYI, I already killed it for the PCIe port drivers a while ago:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/helgaas/pci.git/commit/?h=pci/aer&id=c5dc3c69f17a7e77359f10c342d1816390bc8846

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ