linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] usb: dwc3: keystone: Add PM_RUNTIME Support to DWC3 Keystone USB driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 17 Aug 2017 15:31:48 +0300
From:   Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>
To:     Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@...com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, ssantosh@...nel.org, linux@...linux.org.uk,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        nsekhar@...com, rogerq@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] usb: dwc3: keystone: Add PM_RUNTIME Support to DWC3 Keystone USB driver


Hi,

Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@...com> writes:
>> Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@...com> writes:
>>> For 66AK2Gx there is a requirement to use PM Runtime to properly manage
>>> clocks and the power domains. Therefore, add PM runtime support. Remove
>>> legacy clock api's calls since other users of this driver worked without
>>> these clock apis calls.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Franklin S Cooper Jr <fcooper@...com>
>>> ---
>> 
>> I already have the previous version of this in my tree. Seems like the
>> only difference was on binding document, right? Do I need to change
>> anything in my 'next' and/or 'testing/next' branches?
>
> Correct the binding document is the only difference. Both of your
> branches looks good.

cool, thanks :-)

-- 
balbi