| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 16:58:55 +0530
From: Prateek Sood <prsood@...eaurora.org>
To: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com
Cc: Prateek Sood <prsood@...eaurora.org>, sramana@...eaurora.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] rwsem: fix missed wakeup due to reordering of load
If a spinner is present, there is a chance that the load of
rwsem_has_spinner() in rwsem_wake() can be reordered with
respect to decrement of rwsem count in __up_write() leading
to wakeup being missed.
spinning writer up_write caller
--------------- -----------------------
[S] osq_unlock() [L] osq
spin_lock(wait_lock)
sem->count=0xFFFFFFFF00000001
+0xFFFFFFFF00000000
count=sem->count
MB
sem->count=0xFFFFFFFE00000001
-0xFFFFFFFF00000001
RMB
spin_trylock(wait_lock)
return
rwsem_try_write_lock(count)
spin_unlock(wait_lock)
schedule()
Reordering of atomic_long_sub_return_release() in __up_write()
and rwsem_has_spinner() in rwsem_wake() can cause missing of
wakeup in up_write() context. In spinning writer, sem->count
and local variable count is 0XFFFFFFFE00000001. It would result
in rwsem_try_write_lock() failing to acquire rwsem and spinning
writer going to sleep in rwsem_down_write_failed().
The smp_rmb() will make sure that the spinner state is
consulted after sem->count is updated in up_write context.
Signed-off-by: Prateek Sood <prsood@...eaurora.org>
---
kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
index 34e727f..5c687f6 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem-xadd.c
@@ -586,6 +586,51 @@ struct rw_semaphore *rwsem_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
/*
+ * If a spinner is present, there is a chance that the load of
+ * rwsem_has_spinner() in rwsem_wake() can be reordered with
+ * respect to decrement of rwsem count in __up_write() leading
+ * to wakeup being missed.
+ *
+ * spinning writer up_write caller
+ * --------------- -----------------------
+ * [S] osq_unlock() [L] osq
+ * spin_lock(wait_lock)
+ * sem->count=0xFFFFFFFF00000001
+ * +0xFFFFFFFF00000000
+ * count=sem->count
+ * MB
+ * sem->count=0xFFFFFFFE00000001
+ * -0xFFFFFFFF00000001
+ * RMB
+ * spin_trylock(wait_lock)
+ * return
+ * rwsem_try_write_lock(count)
+ * spin_unlock(wait_lock)
+ * schedule()
+ *
+ * Reordering of atomic_long_sub_return_release() in __up_write()
+ * and rwsem_has_spinner() in rwsem_wake() can cause missing of
+ * wakeup in up_write() context. In spinning writer, sem->count
+ * and local variable count is 0XFFFFFFFE00000001. It would result
+ * in rwsem_try_write_lock() failing to acquire rwsem and spinning
+ * writer going to sleep in rwsem_down_write_failed().
+ *
+ *
+ * The RMB in below example is to make sure that the spinner state is
+ * consulted after sem->count is updated in up_write context.
+ * This would guarantee trylock on rwsem is successful
+ * in rwsem_down_write_failed().
+ * spinning writer up_write caller
+ * --------------- -----------------------
+ * [S] osq_unlock() atomic_update(sem->count)
+ * RMB
+ * atomic_update(sem->count) [L] osq
+ * MB
+ * rwsem_try_write_lock(count)
+ */
+ smp_rmb();
+
+ /*
* If a spinner is present, it is not necessary to do the wakeup.
* Try to do wakeup only if the trylock succeeds to minimize
* spinlock contention which may introduce too much delay in the
--
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.,
is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists