lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 22 Aug 2017 22:18:06 -0400
From:   "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To:     Suganath Prabu S <suganath-prabu.subramani@...adcom.com>
Cc:     jejb@...nel.org, hch@...radead.org, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, Sathya.Prakash@...adcom.com,
        kashyap.desai@...adcom.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        chaitra.basappa@...adcom.com, sreekanth.reddy@...adcom.com,
        linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] mpt3sas driver NVMe support:


Suganath,

>   mpt3sas: SGL to PRP Translation for I/Os to NVMe  devices

I'm still confused about this patch.

 - I don't understand why you go through all these hoops to decide
   whether to use PRPs or IEEE scatterlists. If the firmware translation
   is slow, why even bother with the SG format in the first place? Set
   the max I/O size to match MDTS and you're done.

 - What's the benefit of using SG for regular I/O commands?

 - If the unmap translation in firmware is slow, why don't you translate
   WRITE SAME/w UNMAP set to DSM DEALLOCATE without requiring
   applications to do encapsulated passthrough?

Also make sure you attribute your patches correctly (From: root
<root@...p-135-24-192-103.dhcp.avagotech.net>). And you don't need that
long CC: list. Just send the patch series to linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org.

Thanks!

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ