lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 25 Aug 2017 13:59:21 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 04/41] x86/boot: Move EISA setup to a proper place

On Fri, 25 Aug 2017, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> +static __init int eisa_bus_probe(void)
> +{
> +	void __iomem *p = ioremap(0x0FFFD9, 4);
> +
> +	if (readl(p) == 'E' + ('I'<<8) + ('S'<<16) + ('A'<<24))
> +		EISA_bus = 1;
> +	iounmap(p, 4);

That should obviously be:

     iounmap(p);

But as a side note:

Can't we finally get rid of this EISA cruft alltogether?

Thanks,

	tglx

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ