linux-kernel - Re: [patch v6 0/3] JTAG driver introduction

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 25 Aug 2017 09:53:40 -0700
From:   Rick Altherr <raltherr@...gle.com>
To:     Stuart Longland <stuartl@...glandclan.id.au>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Oleksandr Shamray <oleksandrs@...lanox.com>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jiří Pírko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        system-sw-low-level@...lanox.com,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        OpenBMC Maillist <openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        openocd-devel-owner@...ts.sourceforge.net, mec@...ut.net,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tobias Klauser <tklauser@...tanz.ch>,
        "linux-api@...r.kernel.org" <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [patch v6 0/3] JTAG driver introduction

On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 1:50 AM, Stuart Longland
<stuartl@...glandclan.id.au> wrote:
> [Note: dropping vadimp@...llanox.com as SMTP server complained about the
> DNS server returning NXDOMAIN.  Apologies.]
> On 25/08/17 18:32, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> Gnah!
>> Whoever writes a slot-in replacement making the character device
>> take precendence wins lots of karma.
>
> What would such a replacement look like though?

See Linus's comments about using the existing kernel GPIO chardev
interface.  It already supports requesting multiple GPIO line state
changes in a single request.

>
> Some sort of system whereby you can read/write single-line commands as
> if talking to a GPIO expander over a UART?
>
> Would you access the GPIOs one by one, or would you perhaps map them
> into a bitmap (maybe arbitrarily, up to 64-bits wide) and perform masked
> operations on the bitmap?
>
> I'm no fan of the sysfs GPIO interface, but it beats poking around at
> registers behind the kernel's back.
> --
> Stuart Longland (aka Redhatter, VK4MSL)
>
> I haven't lost my mind...
>   ...it's backed up on a tape somewhere.
>