lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 05 Sep 2017 19:21:06 -0700
From:   Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@...el.com>
To:     Bhupesh Sharma <bhsharma@...hat.com>
Cc:     "linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        "jlee@...e.com" <jlee@...e.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        "luto@...nel.org" <luto@...nel.org>,
        "mst@...hat.com" <mst@...hat.com>,
        "Neri, Ricardo" <ricardo.neri@...el.com>,
        "Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/3] Use mm_struct and switch_mm() instead of manually


> I get a similar crash on Qemu with linus's master branch and the V2
> applied on top of it. Here are the details of my test environment:
> 
> 1. I use the OVMF (EDK2) EFI firmware to launch the kernel:
> edk2.git/ovmf-x64
> 
> 2. I used linus's master branch (HEAD - commit:
> b1b6f83ac938d176742c85757960dec2cf10e468) and applied your v2 on top
> of the same.
> 
> 3. I use the following qemu command line to launch the test:
> 
> # /usr/local/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 --version
> QEMU emulator version 2.9.50 (v2.9.0-526-g76d20ea)
> Copyright (c) 2003-2017 Fabrice Bellard and the QEMU Project developers
> 
> # /usr/local/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm  -net nic -net tap  -m
> $MEMSIZE -nographic -drive file=$DISK_IMAGE,if=virtio,format=qcow2
> -vga std -boot c -cpu host -kernel $KERNEL -append
> "crashkernel=$CRASH_MEMSIZE console=ttyS0,115200n81"  -initrd
> $INITRAMFS -bios $OVMF_FW_PATH
> 
> And here is the crash log:
> 
> [    0.006054] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
> [    0.006459] Modules linked in:
> [    0.006711] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.13.0+ #3
> [    0.007000] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996),
> BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
> [    0.007000] task: ffffffff81e0f480 task.stack: ffffffff81e00000
> [    0.007000] RIP: 0010:switch_mm_irqs_off+0x1bc/0x440
> [    0.007000] RSP: 0000:ffffffff81e03d80 EFLAGS: 00010086
> [    0.007000] RAX: 800000007d084000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 000077ff80000000
> [    0.007000] RDX: 000000007d084000 RSI: 8000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000019a00
> [    0.007000] RBP: ffffffff81e03dc0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff88007d085000
> [    0.007000] R10: ffffffff81e03dd8 R11: 000000007d095063 R12: ffffffff81e5c6a0
> [    0.007000] R13: ffffffff81ed4f40 R14: 0000000000000030 R15: 0000000000000001
> [    0.007000] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88007d400000(0000)
> knlGS:0000000000000000
> [    0.007000] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> [    0.007000] CR2: ffff88007d754000 CR3: 000000000220a000 CR4: 00000000000406b0
> [    0.007000] Call Trace:
> [    0.007000]  switch_mm+0xd/0x20
> [    0.007000]  ? switch_mm+0xd/0x20
> [    0.007000]  efi_switch_mm+0x3e/0x4a
> [    0.007000]  efi_call_phys_prolog+0x28/0x1ac
> [    0.007000]  efi_enter_virtual_mode+0x35a/0x48f
> [    0.007000]  start_kernel+0x332/0x3b8
> [    0.007000]  x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x2c
> [    0.007000]  x86_64_start_kernel+0x178/0x18b
> [    0.007000]  secondary_startup_64+0xa5/0xa5
> [    0.007000]  ? secondary_startup_64+0xa5/0xa5
> [    0.007000] Code: 00 00 00 80 49 03 55 50 0f 82 7f 02 00 00 48 b9
> 00 00 00 80 ff 77 00 00 48 be 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 80 48 01 ca 48 09
> f0 48 09 d0 <0f> 22 d8 0f 1f 44 00 00 e9 47 ff ff ff 65 8b 05 b8 87 fb
> 7e 89
> [    0.007000] RIP: switch_mm_irqs_off+0x1bc/0x440 RSP: ffffffff81e03d80
> [    0.007000] ---[ end trace bfa55bf4e4765255 ]---
> [    0.007000] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill the idle task!
> [    0.007000] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill
> the idle task!
> 
> 4. Note though that if I use the EFI_MIXED mode (i.e. 32-bit ovmf
> firmware and 64-bit x86 kernel) with your patches, the primary kernel
> boots fine on Qemu:
> 
> ovmf firmware used in this case - edk2.git/ovmf-ia32
> 
> 5. Also, if I append 'efi=old_map' to the bootargs (for the failing
> case in point 3 above), I see the primary kernel boots fine on Qemu as
> well.
> 
> Regards,
> Bhupesh

Hi Bhupesh,

Thanks a lot for the detailed explanation. They are helpful to reproduce
the issue quickly. From my initial debug, I think that AMD SME +
efi_mm_struct patches + -cpu host (in qemu) are required to reproduce
the issue on qemu.

I have tried the following combinations (all tests are on qemu):
On Linus's tree:
1. With  SME and  efi_mm and  -cpu host -> panics
2. With  SME and  efi_mm and !-cpu host -> boots
3. With  SME and !efi_mm and  -cpu host -> boots
4. With  SME and !efi_mm and !-cpu host -> boots
5. With !SME and  efi_mm and  -cpu host -> boots
6. With !SME and  efi_mm and !-cpu host -> boots
7. With !SME and !efi_mm and  -cpu host -> boots
8. With !SME and !efi_mm and !-cpu host -> boots

On Matt's tree (no SME):
1. With  efi_mm and  -cpu host -> boots
2. With  efi_mm and !-cpu host -> boots
3. With !efi_mm and  -cpu host -> boots
4. With !efi_mm and !-cpu host -> boots

Summary:
On Matt's tree (next branch), I am unable to reproduce the issue because
they don't have SME patches.

On Linus's tree, with SME patches
(b1b6f83ac938d176742c85757960dec2cf10e468) and my patches and -cpu host
switch enabled in qemu, I was able to reproduce the issue.

Could you please confirm if you are seeing the same behavior?
Specially on real machines (I think, this is equivalent to -cpu host on
qemu) because in earlier mails you have mentioned that you were able to
reproduce this on Matt's tree, but according to my theory it shouldn't
be the case because Matt's three doesn't have SME patches.
Did you back port (b1b6f83ac938d176742c85757960dec2cf10e468) this commit
to Matt's tree and then applied my patches?

Your confirmation will help us in debugging the right issue.

Regards,
Sai

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ