lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 6 Sep 2017 16:14:50 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Paul Burton <paul.burton@...tec.com>
cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        jeffy <jeffy.chen@...k-chips.com>,
        Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>, dianders@...omium.org,
        tfiga@...omium.org, james.hogan@...tec.com
Subject: Re: [2/2] genirq: Warn when IRQ_NOAUTOEN is used with shared
 interrupts

On Wed, 6 Sep 2017, Paul Burton wrote:
> On Wednesday, 6 September 2017 01:16:48 PDT Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > What's the problem with IRQ_NOAUTOEN and do
> > 
> >        setup_percpu_irq();
> >        enable_percpu_irq();
> > 
> > on the boot CPU and then later call it when the secondary CPUs come up in
> > cpu bringup code or a hotplug state callback?
> 
> There's no problem with that at all, apart from that it triggers your warning 
> when the boot CPU calls setup_percpu_irq().

Ok, I misread the whole thing somehow. What you are saying is that you need
per cpu interrupts which can be shared ....

Hrmpf, ok. I'll have a look from that side then

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ