linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC v3 0/4] Add cross-compilation support to eBPF samples

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 5 Sep 2017 20:27:01 -0700
From:   Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:BPF (Safe dynamic programs and tools)" 
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
        Alison Chaiken <alison@...-devel.com>,
        Chenbo Feng <fengc@...gle.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 0/4] Add cross-compilation support to eBPF samples

Hi Alexei,

On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 8:24 PM, Alexei Starovoitov
<alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 03, 2017 at 11:23:21AM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>> These patches fix issues seen when cross-compiling eBPF samples on arm64.
>> Compared to [1], I dropped the controversial inline-asm patch pending further
>> discussion on the right way to do it. However these patches are still a step in
>> the right direction and I wanted them to get in before the more controversial
>> bit.
>
> All patches in this set look good to me.
> When you repost without changes after net-next reopens pls keep my:
> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>

Thanks a lot! will do.

Regards,
Joel