lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 6 Sep 2017 15:57:58 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     tglx@...utronix.de, mhiramat@...nel.org, namhyung@...nel.org,
        vedang.patel@...el.com, bigeasy@...utronix.de,
        joel.opensrc@...il.com, joelaf@...gle.com,
        mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, baohong.liu@...el.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/40] tracing: Apply absolute timestamps to instance
 max buffer

On Tue,  5 Sep 2017 16:57:19 -0500
Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com> wrote:

> From: Baohong Liu <baohong.liu@...el.com>
> 
> Currently absolute timestamps are applied to both regular and max
> buffers only for global trace. For instance trace, absolute
> timestamps are applied only to regular buffer. But, regular and max
> buffers can be swapped, for example, following a snapshot. So, for
> instance trace, bad timestamps can be seen following a snapshot.
> Let's apply absolute timestamps to instance max buffer as well.
> 
> Similarly, buffer clock change is applied to instance max buffer
> as well.

Hmm, this is a bug fix in its own right. I'll pull this in for the
current merge window and slap a stable tag on it too.

-- Steve

> 
> Signed-off-by: Baohong Liu <baohong.liu@...el.com>
> ---
>  kernel/trace/trace.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> index 66d465e..719e4c1 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> @@ -6223,7 +6223,7 @@ static int tracing_set_clock(struct trace_array *tr, const char *clockstr)
>  	tracing_reset_online_cpus(&tr->trace_buffer);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_TRACER_MAX_TRACE
> -	if (tr->flags & TRACE_ARRAY_FL_GLOBAL && tr->max_buffer.buffer)
> +	if (tr->max_buffer.buffer)
>  		ring_buffer_set_clock(tr->max_buffer.buffer, trace_clocks[i].func);
>  	tracing_reset_online_cpus(&tr->max_buffer);
>  #endif
> @@ -6307,7 +6307,7 @@ int tracing_set_time_stamp_abs(struct trace_array *tr, bool abs)
>  	tracing_reset_online_cpus(&tr->trace_buffer);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_TRACER_MAX_TRACE
> -	if (tr->flags & TRACE_ARRAY_FL_GLOBAL && tr->max_buffer.buffer)
> +	if (tr->max_buffer.buffer)
>  		ring_buffer_set_time_stamp_abs(tr->max_buffer.buffer, abs);
>  	tracing_reset_online_cpus(&tr->max_buffer);
>  #endif

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ