linux-kernel - Re: SME/32-bit regression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 6 Sep 2017 17:03:51 -0400
From:   Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
Cc:     "Lendacky, Thomas" <Thomas.Lendacky@....com>,
        X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: SME/32-bit regression

On 09/06/2017 02:19 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 01:06:50PM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:
>> I did the following quick run with your patch and everything seems to be
>> working okay
>>
>> 64-bit build:
>> -------
>> 1) Baremetal SME *enabled* - System boots fine
>>  a) 32-bit guest launch : successful (KVM HV)
>>  b) 64-bit guest launch : successful (KVM HV)
>>  c) 64-bit SEV guest launch : successful (KVM HV)
>>
>> 2) Baremetal SME *disabled* - System boots fine
>>  a) 32-bit guest launch : successful (KVM HV)
>>  b) 64-bit guest launch : successful (KVM HV)
>>  c) 64-bit SEV guest launch : successful (KVM HV)
>>
>> 32-bit build
>> ----------
>> I am installing 32-bit distro to verify 32-bit baremetal boot and will
>> report my findings soon.
> Thanks Brijesh, that's awesome!
>
> I'll add your Tested-by once you're done testing successfully.


You can have my Tested-by (mostly Xen but some baremetal too).

-boris