linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] KVM: SVM: Add irqchip_split() checks before enabling AVIC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 12 Sep 2017 16:22:40 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, joro@...tes.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] KVM: SVM: Add irqchip_split() checks before enabling
 AVIC

On 12/09/2017 15:17, Radim Krčmář wrote:
>>> Yeah, hacking TMR to get the VM exit could result in future bugs.
>>> We have to push split irqchip as the deafult in userspaces with this
>>> change.
>> Actually, I'm not quite sure about the advantages/disadvantages with split
>> irqchip, and how it would affect other cases, and why it was not used as
>> default currently.
> The main advantage of split irqchip is that we're moving code out of the
> kernel, and QEMU's irqchip currently has more features too.
> 
> I think it is not the default as the support for split irqchip is recent
> (v4.3) and has lower performance, so it is only used in cases that need
> the extra features.

One other difference is that in-kernel PIT is not supported with
split-irqchip, and the QEMU PIT lacks support for reinjecting lost
ticks.  But this should only be needed for very old guests at this point.

Paolo