linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] integrity: replace call to integrity_read

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 15 Sep 2017 07:00:10 +1000 (AEST)
From:   James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
cc:     Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        linux-ima-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] integrity: replace call to integrity_read_file with
 kernel version

On Thu, 14 Sep 2017, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 06:21:28AM +1000, James Morris wrote:
> > So, to be clear, this patch solves the XFS deadlock using a different 
> > approach (to the now reverted integrity_read approach), which Christoph 
> > also says is more correct generally.  Correct?
> 
> No.  It is in addition to the previous patches - the patches were
> correct for the IMA interaction with the I/O path.  It just turns
> out that the function was also reused for reading certificates
> at initialization time, for which that change was incorrect.
> 
> If this series is applied first the integrity_read code is not
> used for that path any more.

Ok, Mimi, please post a complete patchset for this issue against my -next 
branch.


-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>