lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 10:05:30 +0800 From: kernel test robot <xiaolong.ye@...el.com> To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, lkp@...org Subject: [lkp-robot] [EXPERIMENTAL] 72536b6862: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -6.0% regression Greeting, FYI, we noticed a -6.0% regression of netperf.Throughput_Mbps due to commit: commit: 72536b68621517bc5ffb3275a79cd76111f71d02 ("EXPERIMENTAL: Diagnostics for lost timer events") https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git dev.2017.09.19b in testcase: netperf on test machine: 4 threads Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3317U CPU @ 1.70GHz with 4G memory with following parameters: ip: ipv4 runtime: 900s nr_threads: 1 cluster: cs-localhost test: TCP_MAERTS cpufreq_governor: performance test-description: Netperf is a benchmark that can be use to measure various aspect of networking performance. test-url: http://www.netperf.org/netperf/ Details are as below: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------> To reproduce: git clone https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests.git cd lkp-tests bin/lkp install job.yaml # job file is attached in this email bin/lkp run job.yaml testcase/path_params/tbox_group/run: netperf/ipv4-900s-1-cs-localhost-TCP_MAERTS-performance/lkp-u410 0f27edb3ca0a17cf 72536b68621517bc5ffb3275a7 ---------------- -------------------------- 12.31 ± 8% 26% 15.47 ± 8% netperf.time.user_time 31896 -6% 29977 netperf.Throughput_Mbps 8802 11% 9774 vmstat.system.in 1:4 -25% :4 kmsg.DHCP/BOOTP:Reply_not_for_us_on_eth#,op[#]xid[#] 0.09 ± 11% 39% 0.13 ± 16% perf-stat.dTLB-load-miss-rate% 9.713e+08 ± 18% 36% 1.321e+09 ± 18% perf-stat.dTLB-load-misses 1.36 5% 1.42 perf-stat.branch-miss-rate% 19789 144% 48346 perf-stat.cpu-migrations 7.813e+11 ± 6% -8% 7.185e+11 ± 5% perf-stat.dTLB-stores 6423 -15% 5470 perf-stat.instructions-per-iTLB-miss perf-stat.cpu-migrations 60000 +-+-----------------------------------------------------------------+ O O O O | 55000 +-+ O O O O O O O O O | 50000 +-O O O O O O O O O | | O O O O O | 45000 +-+ | 40000 +-+ | | | 35000 +-+ | 30000 +-+ | | | 25000 +-+ | 20000 +-+ .+.. .+..+. .+. .| | +..+.+..+.+..+.+.+..+ + +.+..+.+. +..+.+.+..+.+..+.+..+ | 15000 +-+-----------------------------------------------------------------+ [*] bisect-good sample [O] bisect-bad sample Disclaimer: Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software design or configuration may affect actual performance. Thanks, Xiaolong View attachment "config-4.14.0-rc1-00015-g72536b6" of type "text/plain" (163255 bytes) View attachment "job-script" of type "text/plain" (7218 bytes) View attachment "job.yaml" of type "text/plain" (4804 bytes) View attachment "reproduce" of type "text/plain" (331 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists