lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 21 Sep 2017 09:30:34 +0900
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To:     Helge Deller <deller@....de>
Cc:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        James Bottomley <jejb@...isc-linux.org>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 0/7] printk/ia64/ppc64/parisc64: let's deprecate
 %pF/%pf printk specifiers

On (09/20/17 22:14), Helge Deller wrote:
> On 20.09.2017 18:29, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> >          This patch set attempts to move ia64/ppc64/parisc64 C function
> > pointer ABI details out of printk() to arch code. Function dereference
> > code now checks if a pointer belongs to a .opd ELF section and dereferences
> > that pointer only if it does. The kernel and modules have their own .opd
> > sections that's why I use two different ARCH functions: for kernel and
> > for module pointer dereference.
> > ...> *** A BIG NOTE ***
> >          I don't own ia64/ppc64/parisc64 hardware, so the patches are not
> >          tested. Sorry about that!
> 
> 
> I just now tested your patch series successfully on parisc64.
> 
> You may add to the whole series:
> Tested-by: Helge Deller <deller@....de> # parisc64

thanks, Helge!

> > Another note:
> >          I need to check what is BPF symbol lookup and do we need to
> >          do any dereference there.
> 
> Not relevant for parisc, since we don't support it yet.

so that was my suspicion as well. at glance it didn't look like
bpf symbol resolution would work on platforms that do description
dereference.

	-ss

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ