lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 22 Sep 2017 10:01:14 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@...il.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the mips tree with the pci-current tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the mips tree got a conflict in:

  arch/mips/pci/pci-octeon.c

between commit:

  19a8d6b7604d ("MIPS: PCI: Move map_irq() hooks out of initdata")

from the pci-current tree and commit:

  8eba3651f1da ("MIPS: PCI: fix pcibios_map_irq section mismatch")

from the mips tree.

I fixed it up (basically the same patch - I used the pci-current tree
version) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as
linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned
to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.
You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the
conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ