linux-kernel - Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 0/3] Simple DVFS support for Allwinner A64 SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 25 Sep 2017 18:29:38 +0800
From:   Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.io>
To:     maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
CC:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 0/3] Simple DVFS support for Allwinner A64 SoC



于 2017年9月25日 GMT+08:00 下午6:27:44, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com> 写到:
>On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:12:09AM +0000, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>> 于 2017年9月25日 GMT+08:00 下午6:10:27, Maxime Ripard
><maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com> 写到:
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 12:15:28AM +0000, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
>> >> This patchset imports simple DVFS support for Allwinner A64 SoC.
>> >> 
>> >> As the thermal sensor driver is not yet implemented and some
>boards
>> >> have still no AXP PMIC support, now only two OPPs are present --
>> >> 648MHz@...4V and 816MHz@...V to prevent overheat or undervoltage.
>> >> 
>> >> PATCH 1 is a fix to the CCU driver of A64, and the remaining
>patches
>> >> set up the device tree bits of the DVFS on Pine64.
>> >
>> >How has this been tested?
>> >
>> >What tasks did you run, with what governor, etc...
>> 
>> I only tested manual frequency switching between 648MHz and
>> 816MHz, and tested the PLL stuck issue by change the OPPs to
>> some random value.
>
>Ideally, we should test that it's actually reliable. Poorly chosen
>OPPs might lead to corrupt data that you might not get before a while.

These are OPPs from the official sys_config.fex .

>
>Please test using:
>https://linux-sunxi.org/Hardware_Reliability_Tests#Reliability_of_cpufreq_voltage.2Ffrequency_settings
>
>And post the report.
>
>Maxime