lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 25 Sep 2017 04:10:17 -0700
From:   Raymond Jennings <shentino@...il.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Aborting a core dump on a fatal signal

Would there be any benefit to allowing an in-progress core dump to be
aborted if the dumping process receives a fatal signal?

Example:

Process segfaults, starts dumping core, but it has a lot of virtual
memory allocated so it promptly leads to a queue-clogging deluge of I/O
that takes in some cases several minutes to finish.

In between the time where it snags the crash signal and the time when
it finishes dumping and terminates, I'd like to be able to send it a
SIGKILL or something to abort the core dump.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ