linux-kernel - Re: ARM64: kernel panics in DABT in sys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 26 Sep 2017 11:23:24 +0100
From:   Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To:     "Ruigrok, Richard" <rruigrok@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Yury Norov <ynorov@...iumnetworks.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: ARM64: kernel panics in DABT in sys_msync path

On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 01:54:57PM -0600, Ruigrok, Richard wrote:
> I also found this issue with kernels from 4.11 through 4.13.  In my tests, I
> found that it reproduces only with 4K page and Transparent Huge Pages. With 64K
> page I was not able to reproduce. RH also reported it here: https://
> bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1491504 Linaro reported on the RPK kernel
> (4.12) on Centriq2400 and ThunderX
>  
> 
> https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3191
> 
> https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3068.

These two aren't the same bug (that's a forward progress issue that we're
currently working on). I don't have permission to look at the redhat one,
but is it just an RCU stall or actually the Oops reported by Yury?

> I was able to bisect down to a specific commit.

I think we're chasing two different things here, so not sure I trust the
bisect!

Will

> First bad commit is:
> commit f27176cfc363d395eea8dc5c4a26e5d6d7d65eaf
> Author: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
> Date: Fri Feb 24 14:57:57 2017 -0800
> 
> mm: convert page_mkclean_one() to use page_vma_mapped_walk()
> 
> For consistency, it worth converting all page_check_address() to
> page_vma_mapped_walk(), so we could drop the former.
> 
> PMD handling here is future-proofing, we don't have users yet. ext4
> with huge pages will be the first.
> 
> I did not use virtualization, simply booting kernel and running the LTP
> rwtest:   ./runltp -p -f fs -s rwtest
> To validate bisecting (good points), I ran 30 iterations.  Usually it
> reproduces in 5-10 iterations.
> 
> If you have any suggestions for instrumentation I can run tests, we can work
> with 4.13 or on 4.11 at the above bisect point.
> I have not tried the 4.14-rc's yet.