lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 26 Sep 2017 15:52:33 -0400
From:   James Puthukattukaran <james.puthukattukaran@...cle.com>
To:     Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
CC:     Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] PCI: Workaround wrong flags completions for IDT switch

On 09/19/2017 07:36 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 9/18/2017 4:05 PM, James Puthukattukaran wrote:
>> Subject: [PATCH v7] PCI: Workaround wrong flags completions for IDT switch
>> From: James Puthukattukaran <james.puthukattukaran@...cle.com>
>>
>> The IDT switch incorrectly flags an ACS source violation on a read config
>> request to an end point device on the completion (IDT 89H32H8G3-YC,
>> errata #36) even though the PCI Express spec states that completions are
>> never affected by ACS source violation (PCI Spec 3.1, Section 6.12.1.1). Here's
>> the specific copy of the errata text
>>
>> "Item #36 - Downstream port applies ACS Source Validation to Completions
>> Section 6.12.1.1 of the PCI Express Base Specification 3.1 states
>> that completions are never affected
>> by ACS Source Validation. However, completions received by a
>> downstream port of the PCIe switch from a device that has not yet
>> captured a PCIe bus number are incorrectly dropped by ACS source
>> validation by the switch downstream port.
>>
>> Workaround: Issue a CfgWr1 to the downstream device before issuing
>> the first CfgRd1 to the device.
>> This allows the downstream device to capture its bus number; ACS
>> source validation no longer stops
>> completions from being forwarded by the downstream port. It has been
>> observed that Microsoft Windows implements this workaround already;
>> however, some versions of Linux and other operating systems may not. "
>>
>> The suggested workaround by IDT is to issue a configuration write to the
>> downstream device before issuing the first config read. This allows the
>> downstream device to capture its bus number, thus avoiding the ACS
>> violation on the completion. In order to make sure that the device is ready
>> for config accesses, we do what is currently done in making config reads
>> till it succeeds and then do the config write as specified by the errata.
>> However, to avoid hitting the errata issue when doing config reads, we
>> disable ACS SV around this process.
>>
>> The patch does the following -
>>
>> 1. Disable ACS source violation if enabled.
>> 2. Wait for config space access to become available by reading vendor id
>> 3. Do a config write to the end point (errata workaround)
>> 4. Enable ACS source validation (if it was enabled to begin with)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: James Puthukattukaran <james.puthukattukaran@...cle.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
>>
>> --
>>
>> -v2: move workaround to pci_bus_read_dev_vendor_id() from pci_bus_check_dev()
>>       and move enable_acs_sv to drivers/pci/pci.c -- by Yinghai
>> -v3: add bus->self check for root bus and virtual bus for sriov vfs.
>> -v4: only do workaround for IDT switches
>> -v5: tweak pci_std_enable_acs_sv to deal with unimplemented SV
>> -v6: Added errata verbiage verbatim and resolved patch format issues
>> -v7: changed int to bool for found and idt_workaround declarations. Also
>>       added bugzilla https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196979
>>
>>
>>   drivers/pci/pci.c   | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/pci/pci.h   |  1 +
>>   drivers/pci/probe.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>   3 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> index 6078dfc..4bca302 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
>> @@ -2857,6 +2857,46 @@ static bool pci_acs_flags_enabled(struct pci_dev *pdev, u
>> 16 acs_flags)
>>   }
>>
>>   /**
>> + *  pci_std_enable_acs_sv - enable/disable ACS source validation if supported
>> + *  by the switch
>> + *  @dev - pcie switch/RP
>> + *  @enable - enable (1) or disable (0) source validation
>> + *
>> + *  Returns : < 0 on failure (if SV capability is not implemented)
>> + *         previous acs_sv state (0 or 1)
>> + */
>> +int pci_std_enable_acs_sv(struct pci_dev *dev, bool enable)
>> +{
>> +    int pos;
>> +    u16 cap;
>> +    u16 ctrl;
>> +    int retval;
>> +
>> +    pos = pci_find_ext_capability(dev, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_ACS);
>> +    if (!pos)
>> +        return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> +    pci_read_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_ACS_CAP, &cap);
>> +
>> +    if (!(cap & PCI_ACS_SV))
>> +        return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> +    pci_read_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_ACS_CTRL, &ctrl);
>> +
>> +    retval = !!(ctrl & cap & PCI_ACS_SV);
>> +    if (enable)
>> +        ctrl |= (cap & PCI_ACS_SV);
>> +    else
>> +        ctrl &= ~(cap & PCI_ACS_SV);
>> +
>> +    pci_write_config_word(dev, pos + PCI_ACS_CTRL, ctrl);
>> +
>> +    return retval;
>> +}
>> +
>> +
>> +
>> +/**
>>    * pci_acs_enabled - test ACS against required flags for a given device
>>    * @pdev: device to test
>>    * @acs_flags: required PCI ACS flags
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.h b/drivers/pci/pci.h
>> index a6560c9..9d9a365 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.h
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.h
>> @@ -339,6 +339,7 @@ static inline resource_size_t pci_resource_alignment(struct
>> pci_dev *dev,
>>   }
>>
>>   void pci_enable_acs(struct pci_dev *dev);
>> +int pci_std_enable_acs_sv(struct pci_dev *dev, bool enable);
>>
>>   #ifdef CONFIG_PCIE_PTM
>>   void pci_ptm_init(struct pci_dev *dev);
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> index ff94b69..0aa6e02 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
>> @@ -1945,8 +1945,8 @@ static bool pci_bus_wait_crs(struct pci_bus *bus, int devf
>> n, u32 *l,
>>       return true;
>>   }
>>
>> -bool pci_bus_read_dev_vendor_id(struct pci_bus *bus, int devfn, u32 *l,
>> -                int timeout)
>> +static bool __pci_bus_read_dev_vendor_id(struct pci_bus *bus, int devfn,
>> +                    u32 *l, int timeout)
>>   {
>>       if (pci_bus_read_config_dword(bus, devfn, PCI_VENDOR_ID, l))
>>           return false;
>> @@ -1961,6 +1961,44 @@ bool pci_bus_read_dev_vendor_id(struct pci_bus *bus, int
>> devfn, u32 *l,
>>
>>       return true;
>>   }
>> +
>> +
>> +bool pci_bus_read_dev_vendor_id(struct pci_bus *bus, int devfn, u32 *l,
>> +                               int crs_timeout)
>> +{
>> +    bool found;
>> +    int enable = -1;
>> +    bool idt_workaround = (bus->self && (bus->self->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_
>> IDT));
>> +    /*
>> +     * Some IDT switches flag an ACS violation for config reads
>> +     * even though the PCI spec allows for it (PCIe 3.1, 6.1.12.1)
>> +     * It flags it because the bus number is not properly set in the
>> +     * completion. The workaround is to do a dummy write to properly
>> +     * latch number once the device is ready for config operations
>> +     */
>> +
>> +    if (idt_workaround)
>> +        enable = pci_std_enable_acs_sv(bus->self, false);
>> +
>
> I think you want to do the part above as part of a quirk that runs before
> the probe.

I don't think there's a way to run this early enough?

static struct pci_dev *pci_scan_device(struct pci_bus *bus, int devfn)
{
         struct pci_dev *dev;
         u32 l;

         if (!pci_bus_read_dev_vendor_id(bus, devfn, &l, 60*1000))  <--- 
the workaround needs to run here
                 return NULL;
...
...

         if (pci_setup_device(dev)) {     <---- the earliest quirk runs 
here, which is too late..
                 pci_bus_put(dev->bus);
                 kfree(dev);
                 return NULL;
         }

         return dev;
}

Am I missing something?
--James

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ