linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] detect identical chip data arrays

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 9 Oct 2017 17:31:48 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To:     Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Cc:     Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.co.uk>,
        Liam Breck <liam@...workimprov.net>,
        Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>,
        Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
        Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
        Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>, cocci@...teme.lip6.fr,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] detect identical chip data arrays

2017-10-09 5:44 GMT+09:00 Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>:
>
>
> On Sun, 8 Oct 2017, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 08, 2017 at 09:18:39PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>> > Rename battery.cocci as check_bq27xxx_data.cocci and adjust the warning
>> > messages to indicate that some structures are the same, in response to
>> > feedback from Liam Breck.
>> >
>> > Although check_bq27xxx_data.cocci says is requires Coccinelle 1.0.7, which
>> > is not yet released, it actually works with the version currently available
>> > on Github, eg from Coccinelle commit 3ba77b3a0f91.
>>
>> I think the rename makes sense, but I would expect the move to
>> happen in one go with "git send-email -M", so that it detects the
>> rename.
>
> I'm not actually sure what is the status of the previous version.
> Masahiro said applied, but I downloaded his tree and it was not there.  So
> I thought this way would be easier.

My tree is here:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/masahiroy/linux-kbuild.git

I had applied your patch a few days before.


BTW, how should I handle this series?

1/2 is reverting it.

So, I can drop the previous one entirely,
then pick up 2/2 only.

Is this a good thing to do?

-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada