lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 11 Oct 2017 07:25:24 +1100
From:   Stewart Smith <stewart@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Anju T Sudhakar <anju@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, hemant@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        anju@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/powernv: Add kernel cmdline parameter to disable imc

Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> writes:
> Anju T Sudhakar <anju@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>
>> Add a kernel command line parameter option to disable In-Memory Collection
>> (IMC) counters and add documentation. This helps in debug.
>
> I'd really rather we didn't. Do we *really* need this?
>
> We don't have command line parameters to disable any of the other ~20
> PMUs, why is this one special?

You could also do the same thing by editing the device tree before
booting your kernel, we do have the facility to do that in petitboot.

A recent firmware patch: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/823249/
would fix the firmware implementation where the counters were already
running before the INIT/START calls, which are likely the cause of the
problems that this patch is trying to work around.

I propose we have the firmware do the right thing and nothing special in
kernel. i.e. not to merge this.

-- 
Stewart Smith
OPAL Architect, IBM.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ