[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 13:43:43 +0800
From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Kemi Wang <kemi.wang@...el.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <khandual@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/page_alloc.c: inline __rmqueue()
On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 10:19:52PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 10/09/2017 07:56 PM, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > This patch adds inline to __rmqueue() and vmlinux' size doesn't have any
> > change after this patch according to size(1).
> >
> > without this patch:
> > text data bss dec hex filename
> > 9968576 5793372 17715200 33477148 1fed21c vmlinux
> >
> > with this patch:
> > text data bss dec hex filename
> > 9968576 5793372 17715200 33477148 1fed21c vmlinux
>
> This is unexpected. Could you double-check this, please?
mm/page_alloc.o has size changes:
Without this patch:
$ size mm/page_alloc.o
text data bss dec hex filename
36695 9792 8396 54883 d663 mm/page_alloc.o
With this patch:
$ size mm/page_alloc.o
text data bss dec hex filename
37511 9792 8396 55699 d993 mm/page_alloc.o
But vmlinux doesn't.
It's not clear to me what happened, do you want to me dig this out?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists