lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 10 Oct 2017 10:35:32 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, trivial@...nel.org
Subject: Re: ARM: s3c2410: Fix a typo in a comment line

On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 10:29 AM, SF Markus Elfring
<elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>> Thanks, applied, squashed and changed commit msg.
>
> Would it be more appropriate to use a commit subject like
> “ARM: s3c241x: Fix typos in two comments” (instead of
> “ARM: s3c2410: Fix typos in a comments”)?
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=6c7a7db2e4c25acf8bd8086797d39a51728139e0

Yes, it would but patch is already applied and I prefer to avoid
rebasing unless really necessary.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ