[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 14:37:46 +0200
From: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>
Cc: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>,
Laurence Oberman <loberman@...hat.com>,
Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
Tom Nguyen <tom81094@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, Omar Sandoval <osandov@...com>,
Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 00/14] blk-mq-sched: improve sequential I/O performance(part 1)
> Il giorno 10 ott 2017, alle ore 14:34, Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de> ha scritto:
>
> Hi John,
>
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 01:24:52PM +0100, John Garry wrote:
>> It's using cfq (for non-mq) and mq-deadline (obviously for mq).
>
> Please be aware that cfq and mq-deadline are _not_ comparable, for a realistic
> comparasion please use deadline and mq-deadline or cfq and bfq.
>
Please set low_latency=0 for bfq if yours is just a maximum-throughput test.
Thanks,
Paolo
>> root@(none)$ pwd
>> /sys/devices/platform/HISI0162:01/host0/port-0:0/expander-0:0/port-0:0:7/end_device-0:0:7
>> root@(none)$ more ./target0:0:3/0:0:3:0/block/sdd/queue/scheduler
>> noop [cfq]
>
> Maybe missing CONFIG_IOSCHED_DEADLINE?
>
> Thanks,
> Johannes
>
> --
> Johannes Thumshirn Storage
> jthumshirn@...e.de +49 911 74053 689
> SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
> GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
> HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
> Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850
Powered by blists - more mailing lists