lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 10 Oct 2017 09:39:57 +0800
From:   Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@...iatek.com>
To:     Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
CC:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        yong mao <yong.mao@...iatek.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        "Javier Martinez Canillas" <javier@....samsung.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Phong LE <ple@...libre.com>, <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/13] mmc: mediatek: add stop_clk fix and enhance_rx
 support

On Mon, 2017-10-09 at 17:00 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> 
> On 10/09/2017 01:35 PM, Chaotian Jing wrote:
> > mt2712 supports stop_clk fix and enhance_rx, which can improve
> > host stability.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@...iatek.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> >   1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c b/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
> > index 555824d..5d99e05 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mtk-sd.c
> > @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@
> >   #define SDC_RESP2        0x48
> >   #define SDC_RESP3        0x4c
> >   #define SDC_BLK_NUM      0x50
> > +#define SDC_ADV_CFG0     0x64
> >   #define EMMC_IOCON       0x7c
> >   #define SDC_ACMD_RESP    0x80
> >   #define MSDC_DMA_SA      0x90
> > @@ -80,6 +81,7 @@
> >   #define PAD_DS_TUNE      0x188
> >   #define PAD_CMD_TUNE     0x18c
> >   #define EMMC50_CFG0      0x208
> > +#define SDC_FIFO_CFG     0x228
> >   
> >   /*--------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
> >   /* Register Mask                                                            */
> > @@ -188,6 +190,9 @@
> >   #define SDC_STS_CMDBUSY         (0x1 << 1)	/* RW */
> >   #define SDC_STS_SWR_COMPL       (0x1 << 31)	/* RW */
> >   
> > +/* SDC_ADV_CFG0 mask */
> > +#define SDC_RX_ENHANCE_EN	(0x1 << 20)	/* RW */
> > +
> >   /* MSDC_DMA_CTRL mask */
> >   #define MSDC_DMA_CTRL_START     (0x1 << 0)	/* W */
> >   #define MSDC_DMA_CTRL_STOP      (0x1 << 1)	/* W */
> > @@ -217,6 +222,8 @@
> >   #define MSDC_PATCH_BIT_SPCPUSH    (0x1 << 29)	/* RW */
> >   #define MSDC_PATCH_BIT_DECRCTMO   (0x1 << 30)	/* RW */
> >   
> > +#define MSDC_PATCH_BIT1_STOP_DLY  (0xf << 8)    /* RW */
> > +
> >   #define MSDC_PATCH_BIT2_CFGRESP   (0x1 << 15)   /* RW */
> >   #define MSDC_PATCH_BIT2_CFGCRCSTS (0x1 << 28)   /* RW */
> >   #define MSDC_PB2_RESPWAIT         (0x3 << 2)    /* RW */
> > @@ -242,6 +249,9 @@
> >   #define EMMC50_CFG_CRCSTS_EDGE    (0x1 << 3)   /* RW */
> >   #define EMMC50_CFG_CFCSTS_SEL     (0x1 << 4)   /* RW */
> >   
> > +#define SDC_FIFO_CFG_WRVALIDSEL   (0x1 << 24)  /* RW */
> > +#define SDC_FIFO_CFG_RDVALIDSEL   (0x1 << 25)  /* RW */
> > +
> >   #define REQ_CMD_EIO  (0x1 << 0)
> >   #define REQ_CMD_TMO  (0x1 << 1)
> >   #define REQ_DAT_ERR  (0x1 << 2)
> > @@ -308,6 +318,7 @@ struct msdc_save_para {
> >   	u32 pad_ds_tune;
> >   	u32 pad_cmd_tune;
> >   	u32 emmc50_cfg0;
> > +	u32 sdc_fifo_cfg;
> >   };
> >   
> >   struct mtk_mmc_compatible {
> > @@ -316,6 +327,8 @@ struct mtk_mmc_compatible {
> >   	bool async_fifo;
> >   	bool data_tune;
> >   	bool busy_check;
> > +	bool stop_clk_fix;
> > +	bool enhance_rx;
> >   };
> >   
> >   struct msdc_tune_para {
> > @@ -381,6 +394,8 @@ struct msdc_host {
> >   	.async_fifo = false,
> >   	.data_tune = false,
> >   	.busy_check = false,
> > +	.stop_clk_fix = false,
> > +	.enhance_rx = false,
> >   };
> >   
> >   static const struct mtk_mmc_compatible mt8173_compat = {
> > @@ -389,6 +404,8 @@ struct msdc_host {
> >   	.async_fifo = false,
> >   	.data_tune = false,
> >   	.busy_check = false,
> > +	.stop_clk_fix = false,
> > +	.enhance_rx = false,
> >   };
> >   
> 
> If you add a flag for hs400_tune then mt8173_compat and mt8135_compat will be 
> actually different and therefore it will make sense that they exist both in the 
> driver code.
> 
Sure, it's okay.
> Regards,
> Matthias
> 
> >   static const struct mtk_mmc_compatible mt2701_compat = {
> > @@ -397,6 +414,8 @@ struct msdc_host {
> >   	.async_fifo = true,
> >   	.data_tune = true,
> >   	.busy_check = false,
> > +	.stop_clk_fix = false,
> > +	.enhance_rx = false,
> >   };
> >   
> >   static const struct mtk_mmc_compatible mt2712_compat = {
> > @@ -405,6 +424,8 @@ struct msdc_host {
> >   	.async_fifo = true,
> >   	.data_tune = true,
> >   	.busy_check = true,
> > +	.stop_clk_fix = true,
> > +	.enhance_rx = true,
> >   };
> >   
> >   static const struct of_device_id msdc_of_ids[] = {
> > @@ -1281,15 +1302,31 @@ static void msdc_init_hw(struct msdc_host *host)
> >   	sdr_set_field(host->base + MSDC_PATCH_BIT, MSDC_CKGEN_MSDC_DLY_SEL, 1);
> >   	writel(0xffff4089, host->base + MSDC_PATCH_BIT1);
> >   	sdr_set_bits(host->base + EMMC50_CFG0, EMMC50_CFG_CFCSTS_SEL);
> > +
> > +	if (host->dev_comp->stop_clk_fix) {
> > +		sdr_set_field(host->base + MSDC_PATCH_BIT1,
> > +			      MSDC_PATCH_BIT1_STOP_DLY, 3);
> > +		sdr_clr_bits(host->base + SDC_FIFO_CFG,
> > +			     SDC_FIFO_CFG_WRVALIDSEL);
> > +		sdr_clr_bits(host->base + SDC_FIFO_CFG,
> > +			     SDC_FIFO_CFG_RDVALIDSEL);
> > +	}
> > +
> >   	if (host->dev_comp->busy_check)
> >   		sdr_clr_bits(host->base + MSDC_PATCH_BIT1, (1 << 7));
> > +
> >   	if (host->dev_comp->async_fifo) {
> >   		sdr_set_field(host->base + MSDC_PATCH_BIT2,
> >   			      MSDC_PB2_RESPWAIT, 3);
> > -		sdr_set_field(host->base + MSDC_PATCH_BIT2,
> > -			      MSDC_PB2_RESPSTSENSEL, 2);
> > -		sdr_set_field(host->base + MSDC_PATCH_BIT2,
> > -			      MSDC_PB2_CRCSTSENSEL, 2);
> > +		if (host->dev_comp->enhance_rx) {
> > +			sdr_set_bits(host->base + SDC_ADV_CFG0,
> > +				     SDC_RX_ENHANCE_EN);
> > +		} else {
> > +			sdr_set_field(host->base + MSDC_PATCH_BIT2,
> > +				      MSDC_PB2_RESPSTSENSEL, 2);
> > +			sdr_set_field(host->base + MSDC_PATCH_BIT2,
> > +				      MSDC_PB2_CRCSTSENSEL, 2);
> > +		}
> >   		/* use async fifo, then no need tune internal delay */
> >   		sdr_clr_bits(host->base + MSDC_PATCH_BIT2,
> >   			     MSDC_PATCH_BIT2_CFGRESP);
> > @@ -1946,6 +1983,7 @@ static void msdc_save_reg(struct msdc_host *host)
> >   	host->save_para.pad_ds_tune = readl(host->base + PAD_DS_TUNE);
> >   	host->save_para.pad_cmd_tune = readl(host->base + PAD_CMD_TUNE);
> >   	host->save_para.emmc50_cfg0 = readl(host->base + EMMC50_CFG0);
> > +	host->save_para.sdc_fifo_cfg = readl(host->base + SDC_FIFO_CFG);
> >   }
> >   
> >   static void msdc_restore_reg(struct msdc_host *host)
> > @@ -1964,6 +2002,7 @@ static void msdc_restore_reg(struct msdc_host *host)
> >   	writel(host->save_para.pad_ds_tune, host->base + PAD_DS_TUNE);
> >   	writel(host->save_para.pad_cmd_tune, host->base + PAD_CMD_TUNE);
> >   	writel(host->save_para.emmc50_cfg0, host->base + EMMC50_CFG0);
> > +	writel(host->save_para.sdc_fifo_cfg, host->base + SDC_FIFO_CFG);
> >   }
> >   
> >   static int msdc_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists