[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 18:24:55 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] v4.11.12-rt13
On 2017-10-07 06:50:53 [+0200], Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > However...
>
> testcases/open_posix_testsuite/conformance/interfaces/clock_settime/8-1.c:
> * Steps:
> * - get time T0
> * - in child: set clock_nanosleep() to sleep for SLEEPSEC seconds
> * - in parent: sleep SMALLTIME (< SLEEPSEC)
> * - in parent: set time back to T0
> * - in child: ensure time when clock_nanosleep() expires is within
> * ACCEPTABLEDELTA of T0+(SLEEPSEC-SMALLTIME)
> ...
> #define SLEEPSEC 5
> #define SMALLTIME 2
> #define ACCEPTABLEDELTA 1
>
> homer:..debug/tracing # time chrt -o 0 /usr/local/ltp/conformance/interfaces/clock_settime/clock_settime_8-1.run-test
> Test PASSED
>
> real 0m5.002s
> user 0m0.000s
> sys 0m0.001s
> homer:..debug/tracing # time chrt -f 1 /usr/local/ltp/conformance/interfaces/clock_settime/clock_settime_8-1.run-test
> Ended too late. 1507351636 >> 1507351634
> Test FAILED
>
> real 0m7.002s
> user 0m0.000s
> sys 0m0.002s
As per POSIX we should sleep only 5 secs despite the CLOCK_REALTIME
change. In RT case however we sleep 7 so we somehow account it which is
wrong.
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists