[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 09:57:25 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
ksummit-discuss <ksummit-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/13] rcutorture: formal: prepare for ACCESS_ONCE()
removal
On Tue, 2017-10-10 at 17:41 +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 09:27:54AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Once ACCESS_ONCE is removed from the code in the tree
> > it can also be removed from checkpatch
>
> Sure thing. We're expecting to rip that out with the ACCESS_ONCE
> definitions in a post-Coccinelle patch.
This treewide series is one of the types that would be nice to
have done at -rc1 via some external automated script service.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists