[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 11:34:20 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 9th (of: unittest: testcases)
On 10/10/17 11:26, Rob Herring wrote:
> +Frank
>
> On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
>> On 10/09/17 14:21, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> For my birthday I've gone and got myself a linux-next tree:
>>>
>>> Changes since 20170929:
>>>
>>> The net-next and drm trees lost their build failures but the rcu tree
>>> gained one.
>>
>>
>> I don't know what this is but it's new AFAIK.
>> (seen on i386 and x86_64)
>
> Yes, new dtc version with new warnings.
>
>> DTC drivers/of/unittest-data/testcases.dtb
>> drivers/of/unittest-data/testcases.dtb: Warning (interrupts_extended_property): Could not get phandle node for /__local_fixups__/testcase-data/interrupts/interrupts-extended0:interrupts-extended(cell 3)
>
> Frank, this is in __local_fixups__, we should be able to remove that
> now as the necessary dtc changes are in place, right?
>
>> drivers/of/unittest-data/testcases.dtb: Warning (interrupts_property): interrupts size is (4), expected multiple of 8 in /testcase-data/testcase-device2
>
> This one is purposely bad data to feed the unit test. If I suppress
> it, then it is suppressed everywhere in the unit test data.
Thanks for the info.
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists