[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 15:26:44 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jolsa@...nel.org,
zhouchengming1@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf/ftrace: Revert ("perf/ftrace: Fix double
traces of perf on ftrace:function")
On Tue, 10 Oct 2017 18:31:25 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> Revert commit:
>
> 75e8387685f6 ("perf/ftrace: Fix double traces of perf on ftrace:function")
>
> The reason I insta stumbled on that patch is that it only addresses the ftrace
I'm trying to figure out what you meant by "insta".
-- Steve
> situation and doesn't mention the other _5_ places that use this interface. It
> doesn't explain why those don't have the problem and if not, why their solution
> doesn't work for ftrace.
>
> It doesn't, but this is just putting more duct tape on.
>
> Cc: Zhou Chengming <zhouchengming1@...wei.com>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists