lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 11 Oct 2017 00:48:34 +0000
From:   Changwei Ge <ge.changwei@....com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Vitaly Mayatskih <v.mayatskih@...il.com>
CC:     "mm-commits@...r.kernel.org" <mm-commits@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        "sfr@...b.auug.org.au" <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        "mhocko@...e.cz" <mhocko@...e.cz>,
        "broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
        "ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com" <ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com>,
        piaojun <piaojun@...wei.com>, Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...wei.com>,
        Jiufei Xue <xuejiufei@...wei.com>,
        Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@...e.de>,
        Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>,
        Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: mmotm 2016-08-02-15-53 uploaded

Hi Andrew and Vitaly,

I do agree that patch ee8f7fcbe638 ("ocfs2/dlm: continue to purge 
recovery lockres when recovery master goes down", 2016-08-02) introduced 
an issue. It makes DLM recovery can't pick up a new master for an 
existed lock resource whose owner died seconds ago.

But this patch truly solves another issue.
So I think we can't just revert this patch but to give a fix to it.

Thanks,
Changwei

On 2017/10/11 3:38, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Oct 2017 14:06:41 -0400 Vitaly Mayatskih <v.mayatskih@...il.com> wrote:
> 
>> * ocfs2-dlm-continue-to-purge-recovery-lockres-when-recovery
>> -master-goes-down.patch
>>
>> This one completely broke two node cluster use case: when one node dies,
>> the other one either eventually crashes (~4.14-rc4) or locks up (pre-4.14).
> 
> Are you sure?
> 
> Are you able to confirm that reverting this patch (ee8f7fcbe638b07e8)
> and only this patch fixes up current mainline kernels?
> 
> Are you able to supply more info on the crashes and lockups so that the
> ocfs2 developers can understand the failures?
> 
> Thanks.
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ