lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 12 Oct 2017 17:09:39 -0700
From:   John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To:     Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.13 0/2] 4.13.7-stable review

On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com> wrote:
> On 10/12/2017 03:26 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.13.7 release.
>> There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Sat Oct 14 21:25:27 UTC 2017.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>
>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>>       kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.13.7-rc1.gz
>> or in the git tree and branch at:
>>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.13.y
>> and the diffstat can be found below.
>>
>
> Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
> kselftest run regression since 4.13.6
>
> selftests: posix_timers
>
> selftests: raw_skew
> ========================================
> not ok 1..7 selftests:  raw_skew [FAIL]

Hrm... Did raw_skew provide any other output?

Also, did you turn ntpd off before running?

-john

Powered by blists - more mailing lists