linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6] eeprom: at24: Add OF device ID table

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 17 Oct 2017 23:40:40 +0200
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:     Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] eeprom: at24: Add OF device ID table

Hi,

> +	{
> +		.compatible = "atmel,spd",
> +		.data = (void *)AT24_DEVICE_MAGIC(2048 / 8,
> +				AT24_FLAG_READONLY | AT24_FLAG_IRUGO)
> +	},

checkpatch reported this one as un-documented. And come to think of it,
since this is solely for EEPROMs on RAM modules, I think we can drop a
DT binding for it. Could you agree? I can do it locally, no need to
resend. I'll do HW testing later, but wanted to check on your opinion
already.

Thanks,

   Wolfram

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)