linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] s390/cio: Convert timers to use timer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 17 Oct 2017 08:17:24 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Cc:     Sebastian Ott <sebott@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        "linux-s390@...r.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390/cio: Convert timers to use timer_setup()

On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 2:06 AM, Martin Schwidefsky
<schwidefsky@...ibm.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Oct 2017 10:58:47 +0200
> Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 16:43:25 -0700
>> Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>>
>> > In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list
>> > pointer to all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup()
>> > and from_timer() to pass the timer pointer explicitly.
>> >
>> > Cc: Sebastian Ott <sebott@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> > Cc: Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> > Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
>> > Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
>> > Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
>> > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>> > ---
>> >  drivers/s390/cio/device.c     |  8 ++++----
>> >  drivers/s390/cio/device.h     |  2 ++
>> >  drivers/s390/cio/device_fsm.c | 10 ++++------
>> >  drivers/s390/cio/eadm_sch.c   |  9 ++++-----
>> >  4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>
>> Applied to s390/linux:feature branch. Thanks.
>
> On second though, this will be postponed until the first merge of
> the s390/linux tree in 4.15 merge window has been done. I do not
> want to rebase the features branch and without the base timer code
> the branch will not compile. But be assured the patch is accepted
> and queued, just not visible yet.

Okay, thanks!

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security