linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] perf record: Get the first sample time and last sample time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 24 Oct 2017 09:16:59 +0200
From:   Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:     "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     acme@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        mingo@...hat.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
        Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
        kan.liang@...el.com, yao.jin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] perf record: Get the first sample time and last
 sample time

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 10:03:05AM +0800, Jin, Yao wrote:

SNIP

> > hum, could you still unset the sample if there's no time given?
> > and keep the speed in this case..
> > 
> > jirka
> > 
> 
> Hi Jiri,
> 
> I check this question again. The '--time' option is for perf report but not
> for perf record.
> 
> For perf record, we have to always walk on all samples to get the time of
> first sample and the time of last sample whatever buildid_all is enabled or
> not enabled. So 'rec->tool.sample = NULL' is removed.
> 
> Sorry, the previous mail was replied at midnight, I was drowsy. :(
> 
> If my answer is correct, I will not send v6. If my understanding is still
> not correct, please let me know.

right, I did not realize we store this unconditionaly.. then yes, it's ok

I think I've already acked this, anyway for the patchset:

Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>

thanks,
jirka