linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] mmc: dw_mmc: Add locking to the CTO timer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 24 Oct 2017 10:41:16 +0900
From:   Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>
To:     Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc:     Ziyuan Xu <xzy.xu@...k-chips.com>,
        Alexandru M Stan <amstan@...omium.org>,
        "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
        linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>,
        "linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] mmc: dw_mmc: Add locking to the CTO timer

On 10/24/2017 02:59 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 9:40 AM, Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
>> ...
>> ...
>>> Yes, it looks hard to get concurrency right. I have a comment for your
>>> DRTO case(patch 5). Let's do some brainstorm there.
>>
>> Since your comments in this patch are positive and you've now added
>> your Reviewed-by to patch #5, I'm going to assume that you'd also like
>> your Reviewed-by on this patch?
>>
>>
>> Jaehoon: I think I have Shawn's review on all this series.  It would
>> be great if you could review them yourself and/or pick them up in your
>> tree.  Since they fix a regression on 4.14 we really don't want to
>> delay too long.  If you're busy, please yell and we can figure out a
>> way to get these in (either through Ulf directly or we should find
>> someone else to make a git tree and send a pull request).
> 
> Ulf: I still haven't heard anything for Jaehoon.  Do you have any
> interest in landing this series directly to your tree?  I think the
> whole series has been reviewed by Shawn.  I'm happy to re-post with
> collected tags or anything else you'd like.  It would be nice to get
> the regression fixed sooner rather than later...

Sorry. I didn't find this email in my mail-box. so i lost this.
Current i'm reading the comment history..Sorry for late. 

Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung

> 
> Thanks!  :)
> 
> -Doug
> 
> 
>