linux-kernel - Re: IB/mlx4: Use common error handling code in __mlx4_ib_create

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 27 Oct 2017 22:36:01 +0300
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To:     SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc:     Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...el.com>,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@...il.com>,
        Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
        Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...lanox.com>,
        Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia@...cle.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: IB/mlx4: Use common error handling code in
 __mlx4_ib_create_flow()

On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 09:34:18AM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> Add a jump target so that a bit of exception handling can be better reused
> >> at the end of this function.
> >
> > I'm not sure this is that big of a win.
>
> Such a view is appropriate because I proposed just another small adjustment
> for this source code place.
>
>
> > I mean you aren't really making the code any smaller
>
> Would anybody like to check corresponding effects in more detail
> after a specific function call was replaced by a goto statement?

You are supposed to do it and not "anybody".

>
>
> > and it's not making it any easier to read really.
>
> Is the code readability still good enough there?
>
> Regards,
> Markus

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)