linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kbuild: fix linker feature test macros when cross compiling with Clang

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 28 Oct 2017 23:59:59 +0900
From:   Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To:     Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Cc:     Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        Michael Davidson <md@...gle.com>,
        Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>,
        Pirama Arumuga Nainar <pirama@...gle.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Mark Charlebois <charlebm@...il.com>,
        Cao jin <caoj.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
        Marcin Nowakowski <marcin.nowakowski@...tec.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: fix linker feature test macros when cross
 compiling with Clang

2017-10-28 3:28 GMT+09:00 Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>:
> + linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
>
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 4:20 AM, Masahiro Yamada
> <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
>> I do not like to add $(CLANG_TARGET) to a place for common helpers.
>> Instead of $(CLANG_TARGET), please add
>> $(KBUILD_CPPFLAGS) $(CC_OPTION_CFLAGS)
>> to cc-ldoption and ld-option.
>
> Thanks for the review.  I agree that sounds like a better option.
>
>> I have two requests next time:
>>   - please include  linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org in your To list
>
> Sure thing. scripts/get_maintainer.pl does not recommend that list for
> this file; is there a way to explicitly add that list to the
> recommendation for that source file?

Ah, I realized MAINTAINERS does not claim the maintainership
of this file.

There are so many misc scripts
in scripts/, so I hesitate to add
scripts/* pattern to MAINTAINERS.




>>   - please base your patch on linux-kbuild/kbuild branch
>
> Will do. Do I need to note it's based off that branch? Otherwise wont
> 0-day bot complain that my patch doesn't apply/build on torvalds/linux
> ?

I am not sure in which case the 0-day bot complain about it.

Now, I applied v2.
If the bot find a problem, it will send us a report.


-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada