lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 30 Oct 2017 10:56:54 +0100
From:   Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To:     Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, akataria@...are.com,
        boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, chrisw@...s-sol.org, hpa@...or.com,
        jeremy@...p.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [locking/paravirt] static_key_disable_cpuslocked(): static key
 'virt_spin_lock_key+0x0/0x20' used before call to jump_label_init()

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 09:38:35AM +0100, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 08:47:08AM +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>On 30/10/17 08:35, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>>> On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 11:51:55PM +0100, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>>>> Hi Linus,
>>>>
>>>> Up to now we see the below boot error/warnings when testing v4.14-rc6.
>>>>
>>>> They hit the RC release mainly due to various imperfections in 0day's
>>>> auto bisection. So I manually list them here and CC the likely easy to
>>>> debug ones to the corresponding maintainers in the followup emails.
>>>>
>>>> boot_successes: 4700
>>>> boot_failures: 247
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>> WARNING:at_kernel/jump_label.c:#static_key_disable_cpuslocked: 7
>>
>>This patch is in the tip tree only, it will be merged in 4.15. So I
>>don't understand why you are reporting this for 4.14-rc6.
>
>Ah sorry, I simply checked recent bisects for that warning.
>Then I'll need to carry out some new bisect on 4.14-rc6.

As Peter found, it turns out to be a bug in 0day robot -- it stored
some dmesg files to a wrong place.

So RC6 is actually free from that bug. Sorry for the noise!

Fengguang

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ