linux-kernel - Re: Regression still in next for drop migrate type checks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 3 Nov 2017 10:32:24 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc:     Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Regression still in next for drop migrate type checks

On Fri, 3 Nov 2017 09:00:12 -0700 Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com> wrote:

> Looks like I'm still carrying patch "mm: distinguish CMA and MOVABLE
> isolation in  has_unmovable_pages" from Michal [1] for commit e1d753dff0fa
> ("mm: drop migrate type checks from has_unmovable_pages") and Linux next
> has been broken for CMA for few weeks now as noted in the discussion
> also at [1].
> 
> What's the status of this regression? How come it's been known
> broken for two weeks and still not fixed or reverted in next?
> This is clearly is not suitable for "wider testing" ;)

Travel to Europe and subsequent bustage in the -next tree held things
up.  Today's merge looks good so I expect to get this into Stephen
today.

In future, please feel free to send such hot fixes to Stephen.