linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] s390/ap_bus: Convert timers to use timer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 3 Nov 2017 13:36:02 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Cc:     Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        Harald Freudenberger <freude@...ibm.com>,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390/ap_bus: Convert timers to use timer_setup()

On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 11:29 PM, Martin Schwidefsky
<schwidefsky@...ibm.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 16:36:53 -0700
> Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 11:38 PM, Martin Schwidefsky
>> <schwidefsky@...ibm.com> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 25 Oct 2017 03:27:37 -0700
>> > Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to
>> >> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer()
>> >> to pass the timer pointer explicitly.
>> >>
>> >> Cc: Harald Freudenberger <freude@...ibm.com>
>> >> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
>> >> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
>> >> Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
>> >> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>> >> ---
>> >>  drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.c   | 10 +++++-----
>> >>  drivers/s390/crypto/ap_bus.h   |  2 +-
>> >>  drivers/s390/crypto/ap_queue.c |  2 +-
>> >>  3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > Parked for the second part of the s390 updates for the next merge window.
>> > Thanks.
>>
>> Thanks for getting these staged. I just wanted to check with you,
>> since I don't see these in -next anywhere yet:
>>
>> s390: qdio: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
>> s390/sclp: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
>> s390/cio: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
>> s390/scsi: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
>> s390/ap_bus: Convert timers to use timer_setup()
>>
>> Are all of these expected to land for -rc1? (Would it help to carry
>> them in the timer tree?) I've got tree-wide changes ready to go once
>> all these conversions have landed.
>
> These patches are parked on a private branches. The features branch
> on s390/linux is the one that is used for -next AND for the upstream
> merge. And since I do not want to rebase that branch the timer_setup
> patches are not in -next as well.
>
> Four of you patches are safe with me, the s390/scsi patch is in
> Steffens patch queue. All good I would say.

Great, thanks very much for double-check! :)

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security