linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pm tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 06 Nov 2017 14:09:03 +0100
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pm tree

On Monday, November 6, 2017 3:10:40 AM CET Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   0563bb7ba67e ("intel_idle: replace conditionals with static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ARAT)")
> 
> from the pm tree and commit:
> 
>   675357362aeb ("Revert "x86/mm: Stop calling leave_mm() in idle code"")
> 
> from the tip tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

The fix looks good to me, thanks!