lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 6 Nov 2017 17:19:16 +0100
From:   David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers@...il.com>
Cc:     syzbot 
        <bot+eb276410a47365e399ee50d68e73650cac178e0f@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        borntraeger@...ibm.com, hpa@...or.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lstoakes@...il.com, mhocko@...e.com,
        mingo@...hat.com, rkrcmar@...hat.com,
        syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, tglx@...utronix.de, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
 ./include/linux/uaccess.h:LINE

On 06.11.2017 17:14, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 06/11/2017 17:01, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 06.11.2017 16:10, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
>>> Does it have to be stack allocated?
>>
>> We can't use kmalloc and friends in emulate.c. We would have to
>> introduce new emulator callbacks.
>>
>> a) for malloc and free. hmmm.
>> b) for carrying out the fxrstr/fixup.
>>
>> Paolo, what do you suggest?
> 
> You can use kmalloc.  Any userspace user of emulate.c would have to
> write a wrapper.  But I'm not sure it's useful... maybe the
> asm_safe+memcpy could be moved to a separate noinline function, so that
> segmented_read_std is invoked with a leaner stack.

That's basically what we had before 9d643f63128b, however without the
"noinline".


-- 

Thanks,

David / dhildenb

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ