lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 7 Nov 2017 16:45:59 +0000
From:   Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To:     Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: remove redundant assignment to temp

On 07/11/17 15:42, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Nov 2017, Colin King wrote:
> 
>> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>>
>> The variable temp is being set at the end of each loop iteration
>> but this value is never read, it is either being updated in just
>> the case 1 block or at the end of the loop.  Thus the assignment
>> is redundant and can be removed.  Cleans up clang warning:
>>
>> drivers/usb/host/ehci-dbg.c:840:4: warning: Value stored to 'temp'
>> is never read
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/usb/host/ehci-dbg.c | 1 -
>>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-dbg.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-dbg.c
>> index 7fb21d01b3d0..70d4768958be 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-dbg.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-dbg.c
>> @@ -838,7 +838,6 @@ static ssize_t fill_registers_buffer(struct debug_buffer *buf)
>>  			default:		/* unknown */
>>  				break;
>>  			}
>> -			temp = (cap >> 8) & 0xff;
>>  		}
>>  	}
>>  #endif
> 
> Good catch, but the solution is wrong.  The original code was mistaken;
> it should have said:
> 
> 			offset = (cap >> 8) & 0xff;
> 
> You can see that something like this is necessary if you consider the 
> code path for the case where (cap & 0xff) != 1 -- the loop would just 
> read the same capability value over and over again.

Thanks for pointing that out, makes complete sense.

> 
> Would you like to submit a revised patch?

Resent as: "usb: host: fix incorrect updating of offset"
> 
> Alan Stern
> 
Colin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ