linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 14/26] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Handle CLEAR applied to a VLPI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 7 Nov 2017 22:04:59 +0100
From:   Auger Eric <eric.auger@...hat.com>
To:     Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Christoffer Dall <cdall@...aro.org>,
        Andre Przywara <Andre.Przywara@....com>,
        Shameerali Kolothum Thodi 
        <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
        Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
        Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 14/26] KVM: arm/arm64: GICv4: Handle CLEAR applied to a
 VLPI

Hi,
On 27/10/2017 16:28, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Handling CLEAR is pretty easy. Just ask the ITS driver to clear
> the corresponding pending bit (which will turn into a CLEAR
> command on the physical side).
> 
> Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
> ---
>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
> index 42ffb9084bb7..5778b50911e8 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
> @@ -1070,6 +1070,10 @@ static int vgic_its_cmd_handle_clear(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_its *its,
>  
>  	ite->irq->pending_latch = false;
>  
> +	if (ite->irq->hw)
> +		return irq_set_irqchip_state(ite->irq->host_irq,
> +					     IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING, false);
> +
nit: could be done before the pending_latch setting as this latter is
not used in that case.

Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>

Thanks

Eric


>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
>