| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 11:15:29 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, will.deacon@....com,
Bob Liu <liubo95@...wei.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] mm, oom_reaper: gather each vma to prevent
leaking TLB entry
On Fri 10-11-17 09:19:33, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 09:54:53AM +0000, Wang Nan wrote:
> > tlb_gather_mmu(&tlb, mm, 0, -1) means gathering the whole virtual memory
> > space. In this case, tlb->fullmm is true. Some archs like arm64 doesn't
> > flush TLB when tlb->fullmm is true:
> >
> > commit 5a7862e83000 ("arm64: tlbflush: avoid flushing when fullmm == 1").
> >
> > Which makes leaking of tlb entries.
>
> That means soft-dirty which has used tlb_gather_mmu with fullmm could be
> broken via losing write-protection bit once it supports arm64 in future?
>
> If so, it would be better to use TASK_SIZE rather than -1 in tlb_gather_mmu.
> Of course, it's a off-topic.
I wouldn't play tricks like that. And maybe the API itself could be more
explicit. E.g. add a lazy parameter which would allow arch specific code
to not flush if it is sure that nobody can actually stumble over missed
flush. E.g. the following?
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/tlb.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/tlb.h
index d5562f9ce600..fe9042aee8e9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/tlb.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/tlb.h
@@ -149,7 +149,8 @@ static inline void tlb_flush_mmu(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
static inline void
arch_tlb_gather_mmu(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct mm_struct *mm,
- unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
+ unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
+ bool lazy)
{
tlb->mm = mm;
tlb->fullmm = !(start | (end+1));
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlb.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlb.h
index ffdaea7954bb..7adde19b2bcc 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlb.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlb.h
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ static inline void tlb_flush(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
* The ASID allocator will either invalidate the ASID or mark
* it as used.
*/
- if (tlb->fullmm)
+ if (tlb->lazy)
return;
/*
diff --git a/arch/ia64/include/asm/tlb.h b/arch/ia64/include/asm/tlb.h
index cbe5ac3699bf..50c440f5b7bc 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/include/asm/tlb.h
+++ b/arch/ia64/include/asm/tlb.h
@@ -169,7 +169,8 @@ static inline void __tlb_alloc_page(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
static inline void
arch_tlb_gather_mmu(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct mm_struct *mm,
- unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
+ unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
+ bool lazy)
{
tlb->mm = mm;
tlb->max = ARRAY_SIZE(tlb->local);
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/tlb.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/tlb.h
index 2eb8ff0d6fca..2310657b64c4 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/tlb.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/tlb.h
@@ -49,7 +49,8 @@ extern void tlb_remove_table(struct mmu_gather *tlb, void *table);
static inline void
arch_tlb_gather_mmu(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct mm_struct *mm,
- unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
+ unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
+ bool lazy)
{
tlb->mm = mm;
tlb->start = start;
diff --git a/arch/sh/include/asm/tlb.h b/arch/sh/include/asm/tlb.h
index 51a8bc967e75..ae4c50a7c1ec 100644
--- a/arch/sh/include/asm/tlb.h
+++ b/arch/sh/include/asm/tlb.h
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ static inline void init_tlb_gather(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
static inline void
arch_tlb_gather_mmu(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct mm_struct *mm,
- unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
+ unsigned long start, unsigned long end, bool lazy)
{
tlb->mm = mm;
tlb->start = start;
diff --git a/arch/um/include/asm/tlb.h b/arch/um/include/asm/tlb.h
index 344d95619d03..f24af66d07a4 100644
--- a/arch/um/include/asm/tlb.h
+++ b/arch/um/include/asm/tlb.h
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ static inline void init_tlb_gather(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
static inline void
arch_tlb_gather_mmu(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct mm_struct *mm,
- unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
+ unsigned long start, unsigned long end, bool lazy)
{
tlb->mm = mm;
tlb->start = start;
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/tlb.h b/include/asm-generic/tlb.h
index faddde44de8c..c312fcd5a953 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/tlb.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/tlb.h
@@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ struct mmu_gather {
/* we have performed an operation which
* requires a complete flush of the tlb */
need_flush_all : 1;
+ lazy : 1;
struct mmu_gather_batch *active;
struct mmu_gather_batch local;
@@ -113,7 +114,8 @@ struct mmu_gather {
#define HAVE_GENERIC_MMU_GATHER
void arch_tlb_gather_mmu(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
- struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start, unsigned long end);
+ struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
+ bool lazy);
void tlb_flush_mmu(struct mmu_gather *tlb);
void arch_tlb_finish_mmu(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
unsigned long start, unsigned long end, bool force);
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 590709e84a43..7dfdd4d8224f 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -218,13 +218,15 @@ static bool tlb_next_batch(struct mmu_gather *tlb)
}
void arch_tlb_gather_mmu(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct mm_struct *mm,
- unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
+ unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
+ bool lazy)
{
tlb->mm = mm;
/* Is it from 0 to ~0? */
tlb->fullmm = !(start | (end+1));
tlb->need_flush_all = 0;
+ tlb->lazy = lazy;
tlb->local.next = NULL;
tlb->local.nr = 0;
tlb->local.max = ARRAY_SIZE(tlb->__pages);
@@ -408,7 +410,18 @@ void tlb_remove_table(struct mmu_gather *tlb, void *table)
void tlb_gather_mmu(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct mm_struct *mm,
unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
{
- arch_tlb_gather_mmu(tlb, mm, start, end);
+ arch_tlb_gather_mmu(tlb, mm, start, end, false);
+ inc_tlb_flush_pending(tlb->mm);
+}
+
+/* tlb_gather_mmu_lazy
+ * Basically same as tlb_gather_mmu except it allows architectures to
+ * skip tlb flushing if they can ensure that nobody will reuse tlb entries
+ */
+void tlb_gather_mmu_lazy(struct mmu_gather *tlb, struct mm_struct *mm,
+ unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
+{
+ arch_tlb_gather_mmu(tlb, mm, start, end, true);
inc_tlb_flush_pending(tlb->mm);
}
diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
index 680506faceae..43594a6a2eac 100644
--- a/mm/mmap.c
+++ b/mm/mmap.c
@@ -2997,7 +2997,7 @@ void exit_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm)
lru_add_drain();
flush_cache_mm(mm);
- tlb_gather_mmu(&tlb, mm, 0, -1);
+ tlb_gather_mmu_lazy(&tlb, mm, 0, -1);
/* update_hiwater_rss(mm) here? but nobody should be looking */
/* Use -1 here to ensure all VMAs in the mm are unmapped */
unmap_vmas(&tlb, vma, 0, -1);
> However, I want to add a big fat comment in tlb_gather_mmu to warn "TLB
> flushing with (0, -1) can be skipped on some architectures" so upcoming
> users can care of.
Yes, this would be really useful if the api is not explicit.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists