[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 12:18:19 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Marcus Wolf <marcus.wolf@...rthome-wolf.de>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: staging: pi433: Possible bug in rf69.c
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 11:42:09AM +0200, Marcus Wolf wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> thanks fot the link. I can't remeber, why and what I wanted to redo. Maybe
> there was a complaint about the format of the patch...
>
> In that patch, we also have the topic with the '>> 3', we were discussing a
> few days ago!
>
> I'd suggest, not to invest the history any more. I'm ok with preparing a new
> patch/new patches, so we can import the fixes.
>
> I also have several improvements for the rf69.c, I'd like to offer.
>
> But I still need to know when to use staging and when to use linux-next.
> I don't want to prepare patches for the wrong tree.
I recommend waiting for 4.15-rc1 to come out, all of the different trees
will be merged, and then you can just work off of the staging-next tree
and I can take the patches.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists