lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 12 Nov 2017 14:32:06 -0800
From:   tip-bot for Rasmus Villemoes <tipbot@...or.com>
To:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
        linux@...musvillemoes.dk, mingo@...nel.org
Subject: [tip:irq/core] genirq: Fix type of shifting literal 1 in
 __setup_irq()

Commit-ID:  ffc661c99f621152d5fdcf53f9df0d48c326318b
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/ffc661c99f621152d5fdcf53f9df0d48c326318b
Author:     Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
AuthorDate: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 22:35:47 +0100
Committer:  Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CommitDate: Sun, 12 Nov 2017 23:25:40 +0100

genirq: Fix type of shifting literal 1 in __setup_irq()

If ffz() ever returns a value >= 31 then the following shift is undefined
behaviour because the literal 1 which gets shifted is treated as signed
integer.

In practice, the bug is probably harmless, since the first undefined shift
count is 31 which results - ignoring UB - in (int)(0x80000000). This gets
sign extended so bit 32-63 will be set as well and all subsequent
__setup_irq() calls would just end up hitting the -EBUSY branch.

However, a sufficiently aggressive optimizer may use the UB of 1<<31
to decide that doesn't happen, and hence elide the sign-extension
code, so that subsequent calls can indeed get ffz > 31.

In any case, the right thing to do is to make the literal 1UL.

[ tglx: For this to happen a single interrupt would have to be shared by 32
  	devices. Hardware like that does not exist and would have way more
  	problems than that. ]

Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171030213548.16831-1-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk

---
 kernel/irq/manage.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
index c65f282..6a1bf9d 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -1289,7 +1289,7 @@ __setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *new)
 		 * thread_mask assigned. See the loop above which or's
 		 * all existing action->thread_mask bits.
 		 */
-		new->thread_mask = 1 << ffz(thread_mask);
+		new->thread_mask = 1UL << ffz(thread_mask);
 
 	} else if (new->handler == irq_default_primary_handler &&
 		   !(desc->irq_data.chip->flags & IRQCHIP_ONESHOT_SAFE)) {

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ