Date:   Sun, 12 Nov 2017 11:53:15 +0100
From:   Ywe Cærlyn <email@...-ywecrlyn-m0a.net>
To:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: A test of the philosophical impact.. Behaviour problems of
 "Gnu-Zealots" = Illegal Unix Rip.

Den 11/9/2017 11:55, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
> Den 11/6/2017 19:13, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>> Den 11/6/2017 11:00, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>> Den 11/4/2017 23:53, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>>> Den 11/3/2017 07:46, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>>>> Den 10/29/2017 17:21, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>>>>> Den 10/29/2017 17:00, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>>>>>> Den 10/27/2017 23:28, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>>>>>>> Den 10/27/2017 23:01, skrev Ywe Cærlyn:
>>>>>>>>> Philosophical requantization of a (atm) theoretical linux 
>>>>>>>>> distribution:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Excellent Ubuntu, is a Good Linux, with a Minimal Jitter Kernel.
>>>>>>>>> An Available Source Operating System.
>>>>>>>>> Philosophical Lead: Ywe Cærlyn.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Desktop Flavour: Customized Gnome
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Finetuned for fast reponsiveness, and smoothness in operation. 
>>>>>>>>> Configuration of Kernel, for favoring short buffers, lowest 
>>>>>>>>> latency, minimal jitter, minimal wasted CPU, max cpu utilization.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Perfect scaling, from desktop to supercomputing.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Redefined Internet, with the finest philosophy, and correct 
>>>>>>>>> attitude.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Call 999-Excellence for a trial CD... No that we don´t have 
>>>>>>>>> yet, but how does it sound?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Peace,
>>>>>>>>> Ywe Cærlyn.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have made a good logo 
>>>>>>>> aswell:http://xn--ywecrlyn-m0a.net/ExcellentUbuntu/ExcellentUbuntu.png 
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I really believe in this, and what makes this just perfect: 
>>>>>>> Everyone is their own newsservice, getting their views on for 
>>>>>>> instance, youtube. And gets the income from this. Which makes a 
>>>>>>> finely granulated internet economy.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A test channel: 
>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCR3gmLVjHS5A702wo4bol_Q
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Peace,
>>>>>>> Ywe Cærlyn.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> With Linus Torvalds as patchmeister as usual, ofcourse.
>>>>>>
>>>>> So considering this, and the finely granulated internet economics 
>>>>> comes from this type of mindset, and with reintergration of it 
>>>>> back, I would suggest changing the naming scheme of "open source", 
>>>>> and "free software" to "Available Source". It is repeated a lot, 
>>>>> and needs to have a corresponding name. (To not speak of avoiding 
>>>>> uneccesary pointer variables in GNU code... ). This is also based 
>>>>> on on my conclusion on philosophy research over 15 years, and that 
>>>>> things need to be right. And even metaphysically. For Success. I 
>>>>> also CC Richard Stallman on this, maybe GNU4.0 will make 
>>>>> considerations for this. The hacker will now not only be free, but 
>>>>> make money. ;)
>>>>>
>>>>> Peace.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Mister GNU Richard Stallman replied me two times on this, since he 
>>>> did not mail LKML, I will restate them here, for the record.
>>>>
>>>> |
>>>> |[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    
>>>> ]]]
>>>> |[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     
>>>> ]]]
>>>> |[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. 
>>>> ]]]|
>>>> |
>>>> |It seems that you're making a new variant of GNU/Linux.  If you call
>>>> |it "something Linux", you are talking about our work but giving us
>>>> |none of the credit.  Please call it "something GNU/Linux" so as to
>>>> |give us equal mention.
>>>> |
>>>> |See https://gnu.org/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html and
>>>> |https://gnu.org/gnu/gnu-linux-faq.html, plus the history in
>>>> |https://gnu.org/gnu/the-gnu-project.html.
>>>> |
>>>> |--
>>>> |Dr Richard Stallman
>>>> |President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
>>>> |Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
>>>> |Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
>>>> |
>>>> And-
>>>>
>>>> |
>>>> |[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    
>>>> ]]]
>>>> |[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     
>>>> ]]]
>>>> |[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. 
>>>> ]]]
>>>> |
>>>> |"Available source" is too weak a criterion.  Free software and open
>>>> |source stand for categories of software that are nearly coterminous.
>>>> |However, available source is a much weaker criterion and would
>>>> |include programs that don't come anywhere near free.
>>>> |
>>>> |Also, the point of the free software movement is that users deserve
>>>> |freedom.  "Available source" doesn't even hint at this idea,
>>>> |so it would not communicate what we want to say.
>>>> |
>>>> |
>>>> |--
>>>> |Dr Richard Stallman
>>>> |President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
>>>> |Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
>>>> |Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
>>>> |
>>>>
>>>> Not even an acknowledgement on pointer variables from this 
>>>> self-appointed spokesman for hackers. Or indeed the larger issue of 
>>>> finegranulated internet economics. How shall an OS indeed succeed 
>>>> if it chokes its own success?
>>>>
>>>> To not speak of the paranoid insertions. Does he fear mountains 
>>>> shall fall on him, for GNU? Indeed GNU seems to be his qualifier 
>>>> and god, he slaves to.
>>>>
>>>> Or is gnu, a god to slave to, free software your food, and Richard 
>>>> Stallman its Jesusian son? Will it be up to others to make the 
>>>> decision?
>>>>
>>>> How much is this in conflict with pure hacking, from C64 asm, to PC 
>>>> C, and the original unix hacking?
>>>>
>>>> Have a Mindful Zen moment on this.
>>>>
>>>
>>> As for my own experience, check out my Biit channel where I am going 
>>> to go through highlights, and do DSP retrofits, remasters etc.
>>>
>>> For instance this track: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMfWsx3JBUg
>>> Uses my own developed absolute minimal psychacoustically corrected 
>>> phase plateau band EQ. Here I am even using these EQs in serial and 
>>> parallel on the mix, and on the master, without phaseartifacts. A 
>>> further developement of the IIR-FIR discussion, into a solution with 
>>> similar sound of input and output.
>>>
>>> Have you ever seen such a thing before? No?. Well I made that.
>>>
>>> I also did a custom theme for the app used there. Which will be the 
>>> principles I will use in "Excellent Ubuntu" aswell.
>>>
>>> Peace.
>>
>> No list replies. Is this not interesting? I might actually move to 
>> BSD. The BSD 3-clause licence might be more suitable for this.
>>
>> Something else I want is also a subpixel accurate, resolution 
>> independent desktop compositor. Without tearing, when displaying 
>> video or similar, and also when recording screen events. (games, 
>> desktop etc.) Transparent mode changing when necessary, etc. And 
>> minimal jitter programming.
>>
>> So bye for now.
>>
> Apple changes away from GNU to Apache for CUSP also.
>
> So obviously I am not alone in this, and the whole userbase of OpenBSD 
> seems to be more like me.
> Seems to be something about the arguments of original unix code, and 
> if GNU simply tries to be a rip of that. And really never invented 
> that at all, and is an enemy of this.
> So if you are like me, then you probably should consider the same. 
> "Unnud Oddox be with you".
>
>
>
It seems clear now, that the often criticised behaviour problems of 
"GNU-Zealots" is due to the "GNU is not Unix" type ripping mentality of 
Stallman. Ripping Unix was ofcourse illegal in its time. That is 
ofcourse corrected with OpenBSD, a legal fork of Unix, and instead the 
three clause BSD licence, which is without all the criticisms of GNU, 
"Tivoization", and supposedly "legal" knowledge.

I have now included a "no GNU-Zealots" type logo, which also can be 
obtained from me, if wanted: 
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCR3gmLVjHS5A702wo4bol_Q

And ofcourse on a larger scale, part of a better internet, an Ultranet, 
a superweb, with clean news, and social netactivity.


Peaceful Saluations.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists